IGWEBUIKE: African Journal of Arts and Humanities

The intersection of religion and politics remains a significant feature of Nigeria’s democratic experience, with Christian clergy increasingly participating in electoral discourse, political mobilisation, and, in some instances, the endorsement of political parties and candidates. While such engagement may be defended as an expression of prophetic responsibility and civic participation, it also raises important questions concerning the political neutrality of the Church, the authority of the pulpit and the ethical limits of clerical influence over congregational voting behaviour. This article examines clerical political engagement in Nigeria with particular attention to the distinction between legitimate political participation, prophetic critique and partisan electoral endorsement. Drawing on theological, ethical and socio-political perspectives, the study critically examines the use of sermons, ecclesiastical platforms, religious authority and congregational networks in electoral mobilisation. The article argues that political engagement by clergy cannot be treated as inherently incompatible with Christian ministry, since the Church possesses a legitimate prophetic responsibility to address questions of justice, governance, corruption, human dignity and the common good. However, the transformation of prophetic speech into partisan endorsement creates a more complex ethical problem because the pulpit carries a form of religious authority that can blur the distinction between theological conviction and political allegiance. The study therefore proposes a framework for distinguishing civic engagement from partisan mobilisation, and concludes that Nigerian churches can contribute meaningfully to democratic development without becoming instruments of electoral partisanship by prioritising political education, ethical discernment, prophetic accountability and respect for the freedom of individual voters.

Open Full Text (PDF)