Journal of Christian Religious Studies

The electoral process in Taraba State is noted to be drafted to a pattern of systemic injustice, characterized by elite dominance, institutional weaknesses, and civic disengagement. This article examines the electoral processes in Taraba State, Nigeria, through the lens of Plato’s theory of justice as presented in The Republic. Plato's conception of justice, encompassing specialization, harmony, and the governance of philosopher-kings, serves as a criterion for evaluating the selection of leaders and the fairness of political processes. Since its establishment in 1991, Taraba State's electoral history indicates advancements in democratic engagement; however, challenges persist, including electoral violence, vote-buying, result manipulation, and ethnic and religious bias. These facts starkly contrast with Plato's concepts of meritocratic governance and equitable representation. They reveal systemic issues that undermine public trust and the credibility of institutions. Nonetheless, there exists consensus regarding the pursuit of order, legality, and equity through reforms implemented by electoral entities such as the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the State Independent Electoral Commission (SIEC). This study juxtaposes Platonic ideals with real-world scenarios in Taraba State to elucidate the disparities between philosophical justice and political practice, emphasizing the necessity for reforms. The analysis determines that aligning Taraba's electoral processes with Plato's principles is crucial for promoting fairness, stability, and democratic legitimacy in the state.

Open Full Text (PDF)