Nnadiebube Journal of Philosophy

This paper looks into the intersection between the concept of responsible governance in Nigeria political system and Donald Davidson’s theory of action. This work, by explaining Davidson’s concept of intention, rationalization and agency, aims to explain more on why there is failure in Nigerian governance in meeting standards of accountability, transparency, campaign promises and responsibility. It argues therefore that when Davidson’s theory is applied in the Nigerian system of governance, it gives room for a deeper philosophical understanding of failures of intentionality, agency and irresponsibility among politicians and their real behaviours and policies. One of the major problems facing Nigeria today is the irresponsibility and blame game which has eaten deep into its structures especially in the political space, where everyone is expected to be held responsible and accountable for their failures in carrying out their duties. Nigerian politicians often make promises during campaign periods and as well make some claims, but they are not able to transform these intentions into transparent, accountable and effective governance. As a result of this, the persistent gap between the actual system of governance and political intentions by politicians ends up in failures of responsible governance in the country. Using analytical and a conceptual methodology, this article is set to establish how misalignments between a political leader’s action and intention contribute to irresponsibility in governance, and how philosophical frameworks can help in restructuring the failed institution.

Open Full Text (PDF)